The wait is finally over; September's Apple event introduced the latest iPhone 17 series, Series 11 Apple Watches, the Apple Watch Ultra 3 and the new AirPods Pro 3.Was it awe-dropping as promised? Yes, in places, but as always, everyone's abuzz with their love – or disdain – for the new gadgets. In particular, the iPhone 17 Pro has proved divisive, but in all honesty, most of the complaints here are very explainable (though, personally, I'm on board with the Cosmic Orange hate train.)Elsewhere, another major event occurred this month; Meta Connect kicked off the next generation of its Ray-Ban collaboration smart glasses, including its first step towards the full Orion experience: the Meta Ray-Ban Display. I've tried them myself, and let me tell you, this is huge news.This and more was discussed in the latest episode of the TechRadar podcast, where I was joined as always by Hamish Hector as well as Lance Ulanoff, Axel Metz, and Matt Evans. Check out the full episode for all of our first impressions and hands-on testing.The long and short of it is, this year's series of iPhones feels more different from each other than they have in a long time – perhaps ever – and it's not just down to the aesthetic differences between them. Each feels like it has a very specific target audience, and you just might not fit into one of those groups.The iPhone 17 Pro stands out the most. From its limited color array to its rather brutalistic design and its immense camera capabilities, it makes sense why Apple's Greg "Joz" Joswiak told TechRadar that the brand sees cameras as their competition, not other smartphones.I've got an iPhone 15 Pro, and I've maintained for a while now that it's the worst iPhone I've ever owned. I spent an awful lot of money on a device where, for the kind of photos and videos I want to capture (aka very amateur), the cameras can be too powerful and complex. That, and I'm pretty sure there's an issue with mine, with some strange focus issues nobody seems able to diagnose. I don't really game on it like I'd planned to, so all that compute power has effectively gone to waste since I bought it.I'd naively thought that Pro was just a moniker for "really, really good" rather than, well, Pro; and I think a lot of customers have thought the same. But with the iPhone 17 series, I'm willing to bet it's less likely for people to make the same mistake. The utilitarian approach to its design and the heavy emphasis on its use as a tool for creatives and working professionals mean this phone isn't for everyone, and that's OK. You'll survive.They really, really should have still dropped a black colorway, though.Watch the full podcast episode above to find out more about the latest and greatest in tech, and who it's best for!

Leonid Radvinsky, the billionaire owner of OnlyFans, has died. He passed "peacefully after a long battle with cancer" at age 43, according to a statement from the platform published by Forbes. He was born in Ukraine, but grew up in Chicago.

Radvinsky didn't create OnlyFans. He purchased it back in 2018, though is largely credited with transforming it from a niche website to a gigantic porn empire. The platform became so huge that reports have indicated that Radvinsky personally made nearly $2 million every day in 2024. His net worth at the time of his death grew to $4.7 billion, which had more than doubled since 2021.

Leonid Radvinsky, the owner of OnlyFans, has died at 43 after a battle with cancer.“We are deeply saddened to announce the death of Leo Radvinsky,” an OnlyFans spokesperson said in a statement to Variety. “Leo passed away peacefully after a long battle with cancer. His family… pic.twitter.com/xJetAcTZmU— Variety (@Variety) March 23, 2026

It has been reported that he was in talks to sell OnlyFans in a deal valued at $8 billion. It's long-been rumored that he bought a controlling stake in the platform for around $30 million back in 2018, though that number has never been officially confirmed.

Radvinsky was famously secretive and avoided giving interviews, but his history is not without controversy. He built his fortune with websites that were much shadier than OnlyFans. Radvinsky founded a similar site called MyFreeCams back in 2004 when he was in college, which has been involved in numerous scandals.

He also founded a website called Cybertania, which provided links to various pornograpy sites. Some of these links claimed to direct users to illegal content involving children and animals.

Forbes did a deep dive into this and found that the site didn't actually lead to the offending content, but it's still likely that Radvinsky and the platform made money by getting people to click on the links. Records also indicate that Radvinsky held domain names like "websyoungest.com" and "aretheylegal.com" until 2014. It's currently unknown what those sites hosted.

He's also been sued for everything from spamming users to impersonating large companies like Microsoft and Amazon to direct traffic to his pornography sites. These cases were all settled outside of court for undisclosed sums of money.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/big-tech/billionaire-onlyfans-owner-leonid-radvinsky-has-died-from-cancer-at-43-163211324.html?src=rss

17 NPM packages with more than a million weekly downloads were compromised to deliver a RATThe attack could turn into a major supply chain attack, experts warnedThe packages were since deprecated, but users should be on their guardMore than a dozen packages on NPM were poisoned with a Remote Access Trojan (RAT), possibly infecting millions of projects.Cybersecurity researchers Aikido Security recently discovered malicious code buried very deep in 17 popular Gluestack packages.The packages cumulatively have more than a million downloads weekly, meaning huge amounts of users could possibly be affected, the experts warned.Revoking access tokensHere is the full list of compromised packages:@react-native-aria/button@react-native-aria/checkbox@react-native-aria/combobox@react-native-aria/disclosure@react-native-aria/focus@react-native-aria/interactions@react-native-aria/listbox@react-native-aria/menu@react-native-aria/overlays@react-native-aria/radio@react-native-aria/switch@react-native-aria/toggle@react-native-aria/utils@gluestack-ui/utils@react-native-aria/separator@react-native-aria/slider@react-native-aria/tabsThe packages deployed malicious code that connected to the attackers’ command-and-control (C2) and received additional commands including, among other things, the ability to upload a single, or multiple files.Furthermore, the trojan can execute Windows PATH hijacking and silently override legitimate python and pip commands.In response, Gluestack revoked an access token used to publish the compromised packages. All of the poisoned tools are marked on NPM as deprecated."Unfortunately, unpublishing the compromised version wasn’t possible due to dependent packages," a GlueStack developer said on GitHub. "As a mitigation, I have deprecated the affected versions and updated the latest tag to point to a safe, older version."The Node Package Manager (NPM) is the default package manager for the JavaScript runtime environment Node.js. It is used to install libraries, share packages with the community, manage dependencies, run scripts, and more.As such, it is vastly popular, having millions of monthly visitors, and hundreds of thousands of registered accounts that frequently publish their packages.Unfortunately, popular platforms attract threat actors in droves, and situations such as this one are not uncommon on NPM, or similar platforms such as GitHub or PyPi.Via BleepingComputerYou might also likeNPM users warned dozens of malicious packages aim to steal host and network dataTake a look at our guide to the best authenticator appWe've rounded up the best password managers